- BASICCOLOR DISPLAY COLORMUNKI NO INSTRUMENT FOUND PRO
- BASICCOLOR DISPLAY COLORMUNKI NO INSTRUMENT FOUND SOFTWARE
but what about the fact that the spyder3 that were released after mid-2009 are supposed to have lower unit variability than the eye-one display 2? the difference is quite considerable after all I have no interest in spending time with a meter with limited HT calibration support. The FAQ I wrote is for home theatre calibration. thanks, but the whole point of this thread is actually the suggestion that updating the FAQ may be something that should be considered, because of the things described in the review by dry creek photo.Īgain, the colormunki's have extremely limited support (as you mentioned). at least on the official website => click The ones I mention in the FAQ have the widest support (which is why I mention them). If you're limited to the budget you mention, see my FAQ "WHich meter is right for me?" and go with one of the lower end meters. Not sure why Amazon just calls it the "i1 Display Pro".
BASICCOLOR DISPLAY COLORMUNKI NO INSTRUMENT FOUND PRO
What we call the "Display 3" is officialky called the "i1 Display Pro III". I'm confused as to what meters we're talking about. if x-rite insists on such an arbitrary restriction, their loss. considering this ridiculous restriction, i might simply go with a spyder after all. i guess they want to sell i1 display pros and not colormunki displays.īut $250. no basiccolor, coloreyes or whatever else one might already have or want to buy. If you're anything like me though and you only wanted to spend an absolute maximum of $150 for a colorimeter and the $170 is already a decision you only make with clenched teeth, the thought of spending $250 is a bit absurdīut another major thing that seems essential is that the colormunki display is not officially supported by anything other than x-rite's software. That's the one that's referred to as "i1 display pro" in the article, isn't it? the third generation after that "eye-one display 2 (LT)", this one here? (i realize it's sold on curtpalme as well but is still named "eyeone display 3", which is exactly the name confusion i would like to clear up.
Very little added cost over the inexpensive Colormunki but performance that rivals the $3000+ Hubble in many ways. IMHO, the Display 3 seems to be the most popular solution for enthusiasts. Last edited by sh4dow on Wed 11:55 pm edited 1 time in totalĪh yes! Sorry - there are two versions of the Colormunki. "display" seems to be the keyword in most of these products in regards to whether they're colorimeters or not. (and actually - the black sensor error as it is demonstrated in the article also shows that) I1display pro (not to confuse with all the other i1 pro hardware - which are all spectrophotometers) and colormunki display: colorimeter according to both that article and the x-rite website, it's like the following:Įye-one pro and colormunki photo: spectrophotometer I think you're mixing some things up here. Support our site by using our affiliate links. It's slow because it's a spectro (like the EyeOne Pro).
BASICCOLOR DISPLAY COLORMUNKI NO INSTRUMENT FOUND SOFTWARE
If the colormunki gains more software support in terms of home theatre video calibration then it's one we'll look at. Last edited by sh4dow on Wed 11:51 pm edited 1 time in total they say the downside is that it's a lot slower. $170 for accuracy that according to the article is on par with the best colorimeters. All the ones we tested were manufactured mid-2009 and later.Īnd colormunki display might be worth adding to the FAQ, considering its apparently amazing price/accuracy-ratio. Older (pre-2009) Spyder 3 units showed high unit-to-unit variability. I just found this interesting review showing that at least spyder 3 colorimeters produced since mid-2009 might be more accurate than eye-one (at least those from the 2nd generation - eye-one 2 LT and the likes)!
0 kommentar(er)
